Beyond DR plans: resilience engineering for modern enterprises
Why disaster recovery on paper is not the same as resilience in practice - and what to do about it.
Read article →Platforms • 6 min read
What separates internal platforms that get adopted from those that quietly become another silo.
The patterns in this article come from our work with large enterprises across regulated and fast-moving sectors. The aim is not to be exhaustive - it is to surface the handful of decisions we see making the biggest difference in practice.
The most successful internal platforms are run as products: a roadmap, a backlog driven by user research, a public changelog, and explicit success metrics (adoption, lead time, change failure rate). Platforms run as central diktats tend to become shelfware.
A well-designed platform makes the right thing the easy thing without making the unusual thing impossible. Teams should be able to opt out - but the cost of doing so should be visible to them.
DORA metrics remain the most useful starting point: lead time for changes, deployment frequency, mean time to restore, change failure rate. Add a developer experience survey on top and you have a balanced scorecard most leadership teams will engage with.
Every enterprise platform initiative is part technology, part politics. Identifying executive sponsors, surfacing wins early and treating sceptics as users-to-win-over (not blockers-to-route-around) is half the job.
If any of the above resonates with what you are working through, we are always happy to compare notes - without obligation. Email is the best way to reach us: customerservices@halfteck.com.
Why disaster recovery on paper is not the same as resilience in practice - and what to do about it.
Read article →How to spot real risk in a target’s technology and team before the deal closes - without slowing the deal down.
Read article →How leaders are moving past “cloud-first” and getting serious about cost, sovereignty and architecture choices that actually pay back.
Read article →